^{User talk:}Jimfbleak

Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.

Request

Request to undelete the page of Anton Bantock. He was a respected educator and artist in Bristol, so much so that a road was named after him. I'm not sure what else I can do to prove his worthyness. Lisacole (talk) 14:28, 30 December 2024 (UTC) LisaCole[reply]

Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restore deleted page: Draft:6ense

Hi Jimfbleak, Thanks for the help earlier. Can you also help me restore the deleted page Draft:6ENSE to my user page? Before it was deleted, I have added new citations and sources needed to meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Re: The group debuted in April 2024, which is relatively new and is fine but the group does not meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV at the moment. The only news announcement of the group's debut was from RepublicAsia.[1]

Thanks in advance. TypeFG (talk) 12:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TypeFG you have not responded to the COI messages as required. Also, I'm not sure why you want restoration when you accept it's at best too soon Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

open protection page : Airpaz

Hi Jimfbleak, you have deleted page airpaz, could you give the step what should I do to restore the page ? should I create the proper article first ? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jodysetiawan23 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kind Request

Dear Jim,

I hope this message finds you well. I noticed that my Wikipedia page was recently deleted, and I would like to kindly request a reconsideration of its deletion.

I have carefully crafted the content based on my personal achievements, career, and philosophy, and I made sure to adhere to Wikipedia’s guidelines to the best of my understanding. I also included a declaration at the end of the article affirming that all information presented is accurate and written by me.

I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of the platform, and I am more than willing to address any concerns or make any necessary revisions to ensure that my article meets the required standards. If you could kindly guide me on the areas that need improvement, I would greatly appreciate it.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your guidance on how to proceed.

Best regards,

Praneeth Roy

Thanks in advance, and wish you a Happy and prosperous New Year! ~~~~ Praneeth Roy Ganeshpraneethroy (talk) 13:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user talk page, unreferenced self-promotion Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hey Jim, I would like to know what were things you think were unreferenced areas, so that I would address them. And Jim, it may seem self promotion, but all of it is nothing but truth, and there's nothing wrong with displaying facts in Wiki, and even I have declared explicitly... so Jim please reconsider my request Ganeshpraneethroy (talk) 16:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you said If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI, so that give me an opportunity to disclose my COI please. Ganeshpraneethroy (talk) 17:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ganeshpraneethroy Please read what I've already posted on your talk page. None of your text had a reference to independently confirm what you claim. It is self-promotion, much of your text is your own glowing opinions of your talents, the definition of self-promotion. This isn't social media, nobody cares what you have to say about yourself here. If you really think you meet the notability criteria I linked, find reputable independent third-party sources as described in my reply so we can verify that. If you really only want to tell the world how gifted you are, do it on Facebook, this is an encyclopaedia. We are not looking for your version of the truth, we are looking for what we can independently verify. Jimfbleak - talk to me?

Ganeshpraneethroy the usual place to diclose a COI is your user page User:Ganeshpraneethroy Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:31, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nemanthus californicus

I think the article Nemanthus californicus is ready to be published now because it is:

categorised
it has more than one sources
articles of equal importance are already published (Nemanthus annamensis and Nemanthus nitidus)

TrueMoriarty (talk) TrueMoriarty (talk) 15:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TrueMoriarty I don't usually review articles myself. Add {{subst:submit}} as you see it here to the top of the page and save, that will create a yellow review waiting box. Given that the article is pretty straightforward, you shouldn't have to wait long, good luck Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Jim	Talk	Contribs	Sandbox	Logs	Blocks	Deletions	Protections	Scripts	Bird talk	Commons